Tobold's Blog
Friday, August 25, 2006
 
Reports of PC gaming's death have been greatly exaggerated

Sorry for stealing the words of Mark Twain, but every time a new console is coming out, somebody announces the death of PC gaming. And the more I see, the less I believe it. When the Playstation 2 came out in 2000 it had a launch price of $299, and was considerably cheaper than a PC. It also held a dominant market position, and if you just bought a PS2 and no other console, you weren't missing much for a couple of years. But fast forward to end of 2006 and the situation has changed a lot.

When the Playstation 3 comes out in November, it will cost twice of what the PS2 cost, $599 for the full version, $499 for the "lite" version. I am certain that the PS3 will sell very well, but it will *not* hold such a dominating market share as the PS2 did. The XBox 360 ($399 in the full version) already has a year head start, and has some strong game brands. The Nintendo Wii ($250) coming out at the same time as the PS3 offers some interesting innovations and games beyond what the PS3 can do, and could well win the next generation console wars, due to being much cheaper. But it is already safe to say that the console market will be much more fragmented in the new generation.

Meanwhile PCs have become a lot cheaper. $650 buys you a "gaming" PC from Dell, which would run a game like World of Warcraft smoothly enough. And the use of PCs for other things than gaming in a private household have multiplied since 2000: surfing the net, downloading music, managing and printing digital photos, editing and sharing videos, all these applications have grown a lot, and made the PC a lot more useful than the home office + games machine it was 6 years ago. If you had neither a console nor a PC, and were on a less than $1000 budget, would you really want to buy a console and forego a lot of the additional options you have with a PC? The price of a console is now bigger than the difference between a basic desktop PC and a cheap gaming PC. Plus PC games are cheaper than console games.

The market for personal computer games isn't fragmented at all. Everybody has a "wintel" PC, the market share of Apple is tiny, and there aren't any major games that run only on Apple or Linux, and not on a PC. Whatever console you buy, there will be a bunch of "exclusive" games on the other consoles that you can't play, there is no way to have both Halo and Final Fantasy, without buying two consoles.

In the end, the PC is here to stay, consoles are just developing too slow to keep up with the pace of everchanging applications for private use. And as long as most people own a PC, PC games are here to stay as well. Single-player PC games sales might be declining, but MMORPG sales and subscriptions are on the rise, and millions of people play cheap or free online games on the PC. The battle about the PC's share of the total video games market will have its ups and downs, but reports of PC gaming's death are truly just an exaggeration.
Comments:
I bought every console released from Nintendo to Turbo Graphics 16, through X-box and while I enjoyed every moment with those consoles, sadly, their time is up. I have played X-box 360, and I do enjoy a few of the games on that platform, but PC in my opinion just can't be beaten. PC games like Rome Total War offer an epic battle unlike any I have ever experienced with a console, World of Warcraft and Guild Wars introduced me to the world of MMORPG's after which I will never be the same, and F.E.A.R showed me what true AI can be in a first person shooter. For those who enjoy consoles, I say enjoy, but for me, I need games that have depth and while some games offer that depth on consoles, I think they are too far and few inbetween to keep me shelling out my money. Nearly every game that is popular on consoles can be purchased for PC; many of them are actually better thanks to user created Mod's.

For children that have no income of their own, I recommend consoles because even the $600.00 PS3 is cheaper than a Dell XPS that is armed to the teeth. But for all of the adult gamers that are out there, my opinion is that PC just can't be beaten, and is worth the extra money. If you think about it, if you play 20+ hours per week, paying a measely $2.73 per day-$3000.00 divided by 3 years- isn't that bad, considering others spend more than that on hobbies like trains.
 
PC is easily the greatest gaming machine on the planet currently, and will remain the greatest long after the release of the latest consoles.

Provided one can afford a gaming computer.
 
Well I must agree that some games are better on PC, specially strategic games, and probalby MMO games. But the figure changes with other kind of games.

Check the upcoming Assassin Creed, MGS4, GT5 on PS3. There's no games like that on PC... And the graphic engines seem to be always behind, no matter how much money you spend updating your PC.

A lot of people also buy consoles, because of a certain brand of games (sonic, mario, zelda, pokemon, etc). Plus consoles are always inovating with new kinds of controllers, that give you new sensations, while PC is always keyboard/mouse stuff. Check the upcoming nintendo wii for example.

Also if you do want a PC for working, video, music, etc. chances are (if you don't live alone) that someone else will be doing something else on it while you want to play...

There's + and - to both, but I think for games, consoles a way above, at least for the great majority of game types. Plus there are still cheaper, even if the prices have been going up. Although they also go down quite fast after launch...

So if you're main interest is gaming, I think console will be the ultimate option...
 
Of course, the first time I even heard about it. I didn't believe it! I mean what could ever happen to you while playing. But if we really want go deeper then maybe we should seek for science opinions on this.
 
Post a Comment

<< Home
Newer›  ‹Older

  Powered by Blogger   Free Page Rank Tool