www.Tobold.com
Tobold@GMail.com
A blog with my thoughts regarding games I am playing and other stuff in life. Please read my Terms of Service
RSS Feed
Friday, January 07, 2011
... and while we are on the subject of building on sand ...
You might have noticed that I'm writing a lot this week. This is not a return to a multiple-post-per-day writing schedule, but me getting some writing done before the work stress start again next week. So while I currently still have time to read blogs, I couldn't help but notice two rather identical posts from Scarybooster and Darren (quoting Scott Jennings), predicting the death of the big budget, subscription MMORPG model in case that SWTOR fails. That is putting a lot of weight on exactly the wrong game: Regardless of how many copies Star Wars: The Old Republic sells, and how many subscribers it will have 6 months after release, it is already certain that a large number of news outlets will report SWTOR as being a failure. Any number that is remotely realistic will appear too small compared to the hype, and taken in the context of a completely invalid comparison with the "12 million" World of Warcraft players. WoW did not have 12 million players after 6 months, and still doesn't have that number in the market in which SWTOR is released.
Gamasutra yesterday reported that Turbine tripled their revenue from Lord of the Ring Online by going Free2Play. While Ten Ton Hammer has a point saying that the subscription model is not going to be completely replaced by Free2Play, it simply isn't true that Free2Play is the same as "shitty, low-budget game". Lord of the Rings Online certainly wasn't cheap to produce, and if it can be profitable as Free2Play, so can other big budget games. And I predict that Guild Wars 2 will be a huge commercial success as well, with yet another business model.
If Star Wars: The Old Republic is either a real or a perceived failure, that doesn't prove anything beyond suggesting that Bioware should have stuck with single-player RPGs. No investor would consider "development studio fails with their first ever MMORPG" as proof that MMORPGs can't be profitable. Of course anyone wanting to make a $100 million MMORPG these days is going to carefully consider what kind of business model would work best, instead of blindly going for a subscription model. But that spells neither the death of the subscription model, nor the death of the big budget MMORPG.
What would it take to really kill the idea of big budget, subscription MMORPG? A catastrophic failure of "Titan" to the point where the game is shut down or at least Blizzard admitting to not having recovered the development cost of that game, and stopping to develop new MMORPGs. Does anyone really believe that Blizzard is going to stop developing "Titan" just because SWTOR doesn't outsell WoW? Or that other game companies will abandon MMORPGs after Blizzard made another huge pile of money with "Titan"?
So, the general idea that a catastrophic failure of a major MMORPG could cause game companies to retrench from the MMORPG market one day is certainly possible. But that major MMORPG won't be SWTOR, and the fateful year won't be 2011. One could have written the exactly same sort of doomsaying posts three years ago, predicting the death of MMORPGs if Warhammer Online would fail. Just didn't happen. And there is nothing special about SWTOR which would make it deserve such a key position for the future of gaming either. Maybe EA is just bad at making MMORPGs.
- posted by Tobold @ 9:49 AM Permanent Link
Comments:
<< Home
Newer› ‹Older
In your article, you say "...Bioware should have stuck with single-player MMORPGs"
How do you have a single-player massively multiplayer online game? Don't the single-player and multiplayer parts cancel eachother out?
How do you have a single-player massively multiplayer online game? Don't the single-player and multiplayer parts cancel eachother out?
@Misanthrope: Typo, caused by my inability to type RPG without putting a "MMO" in front of it. :) Fixed.
it simply isn't true that Free2Play is the same as "shitty, low-budget game"
Well in all fairness LOTRO was a subscription based game first, and so was DDO and CO. I have nothing to back this up with but I have the feeling that a game launched with F2P isn't going to have the same development budget as a subscription based game. If so, then it's rather that a F2P launched game is more likely to be a "shitty low budget game".
The biggest cost is of course development, and if you can carry that by selling a box and a subscription for at least the first time it might very well be worth switching over to F2P after that, and the compromise with quality will probably not be as large then.
Well in all fairness LOTRO was a subscription based game first, and so was DDO and CO. I have nothing to back this up with but I have the feeling that a game launched with F2P isn't going to have the same development budget as a subscription based game. If so, then it's rather that a F2P launched game is more likely to be a "shitty low budget game".
The biggest cost is of course development, and if you can carry that by selling a box and a subscription for at least the first time it might very well be worth switching over to F2P after that, and the compromise with quality will probably not be as large then.
> One could have written the exactly same sort of doomsaying posts three years ago, predicting the death of MMORPGs if Warhammer Online would fail.
http://onlinegamesareanichemarket.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/what-does-wars-success-or-failure-mean-for-the-mmorpg-market/
http://onlinegamesareanichemarket.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/what-does-wars-success-or-failure-mean-for-the-mmorpg-market/
@Magroth. Allods started out as free to download, free to play game and it looks and plays pretty darn well. (if not for it being pvp centric, I'd be playing it a lot more and honestly, same goes for warhammer online)
Guild wars 2 is going to be a F2P game, and if you had seen the videos of it, it looks fantastic (granted - you still need to buy the initial software, but we're talking about subscription models, yes? and GW2 is free to play.
in my opinion, it would take several free to play mmo's that are hugely successful from the very start to kill the subscription model, rather then failure of one game. right now, people are used to everquest, WoW etc model, so paying monthly fee feels more natural then playing for free. this mindset will have to change first and that takes success, not failure.
as for SWTOR, right now, I personally have better expectations of Bioware, then Blizzard judging by recent quality of games as well as developer/gamer communication. Ironically, that might be also their undoing - as they set the quality bar pretty darn high.
Guild wars 2 is going to be a F2P game, and if you had seen the videos of it, it looks fantastic (granted - you still need to buy the initial software, but we're talking about subscription models, yes? and GW2 is free to play.
in my opinion, it would take several free to play mmo's that are hugely successful from the very start to kill the subscription model, rather then failure of one game. right now, people are used to everquest, WoW etc model, so paying monthly fee feels more natural then playing for free. this mindset will have to change first and that takes success, not failure.
as for SWTOR, right now, I personally have better expectations of Bioware, then Blizzard judging by recent quality of games as well as developer/gamer communication. Ironically, that might be also their undoing - as they set the quality bar pretty darn high.
I'm in the camp that tends to to think that nothing, not even Titan, will ever rise to the success of WoW.
So yes, I think the upcoming failure (compared to WoW's current numbers, which, as you point out, aren't a fair comparison but everyone makes it anyway) of Titan will finally be the end of the big-budget subscription game. If Blizzard can't do it, maybe everyone else can finally stop thinking they, too, can bottle lightning again and start exploring different business models.
Most WoW players don't play MMOs, they play WoW. I would honestly be surprised if Titan is able to convert more than 1 million of WoW's North American playerbase, especially if it really is a "totally new IP."
But I suspect Blizzard itself will explore a new business model for Titan. I expect it will offer, at the very least, a special rate for WoW subscribers, which will make it hard to make comparisons between Titan and, say, SWTOR.
Post a Comment
So yes, I think the upcoming failure (compared to WoW's current numbers, which, as you point out, aren't a fair comparison but everyone makes it anyway) of Titan will finally be the end of the big-budget subscription game. If Blizzard can't do it, maybe everyone else can finally stop thinking they, too, can bottle lightning again and start exploring different business models.
Most WoW players don't play MMOs, they play WoW. I would honestly be surprised if Titan is able to convert more than 1 million of WoW's North American playerbase, especially if it really is a "totally new IP."
But I suspect Blizzard itself will explore a new business model for Titan. I expect it will offer, at the very least, a special rate for WoW subscribers, which will make it hard to make comparisons between Titan and, say, SWTOR.
<< Home
