I haven't finished printing the cover yet, nor put in the little magnets in the holes you can see on the top. But you can imagine the final product both storing the tokens in the box, and sitting next to the board during play for easy access to all the tokens you need.

The reason I show this is because to me this symbolizes the opportunities and limitations of 3D printing. Yes, I can 3D print a highly specialized object, fitting exactly some very narrow need of the moment. I used an existing design, but an object like this is easy enough that I could design one myself if needed. It took nearly 5 hours to print, and I'll only ever need one of them. I don't know how many copies of JIME sold, Board Game Geek lists 14k community members owning one; but obviously there isn't a huge market for a part like this.

An injection molding machine could make a part like this in about 3 seconds, and produce thousands per day. Nobody does that, because there isn't a market for thousands of these things. 3D printing is useful for objects where you only need one or a few of. But if you read somewhere that 3D printing is the future of manufacturing, you should watch some videos on YouTube showing an injection molding machine spewing out 72 bottle caps every 3 seconds. A lot of plastic parts, from packaging to children's toys, are made in the thousands or even millions, and that cannot possibly be replaced by 3D printing. In fact, I would have a hard time 3D printing a single bottle cap, because the thread would be hard to do, the PLA I printed the token holder with would probably be too stiff for a bottle cap, and the material isn't even approved for food contact. I had plastic parts breaking in my household, for example the filter holder of my coffee machine, where it was easy enough to order a $10 replacement from the internet, while printing it would have been extremely hard, and not safe for food contact. In short, 3D printing certainly has "a" future, but it also certainly isn't "the" future of manufacturing.