Thursday, December 17, 2020
A post scriptum note on reviewing games
In my previous post I wrote about what I liked and didn't like about two board games, in comparison. I do hope that, at least for those of you who have an interest in board games, such a post is of interest. Having said that, my experience over the last week with reviews is that they can be all over the place. Take for example Cyberpunk 2077, a game which was released to reviews averaging over 90 on Metacritic, but which is now slightly down on PC at 87, while the PS4 version is scored at 54. In the world of board games, Etherfields is getting reviews ranging from "game of the year" to "nightmare".
The lesson here is that for a review to be useful, the review needs to clearly state what exactly it sees as the good points or the bad points of a game. Because sometimes I read a bad review that complains about an issue I simply don't care about. Maybe a game didn't get the lore of some famous license right, or isn't woke enough for the reviewer, but if I personally don't care so much about these issues, that wouldn't be a reason for me to think less of a game. I decided against both Cyberpunk 2077 and Etherfields, but for example the glitches on PS4 didn't really play a role in my decision on Cyberpunk (I don't even own a PS4), while the great quality of the miniatures didn't make me excited for Etherfields.
I don't think I can give a complete and accurate description of why I don't want to buy Cyberpunk 2077 or Etherfields. Sometimes it is small things that seem irrelevant, but make you decide one way or another. Sometimes I watch a game being played on YouTube, and it just doesn't feel like it is right for me. Very often that has to do with the "flow" of a game. Even from the positive reviews you can see that the flow of Etherfields isn't right, and that in a game where you jump between different modes of gameplay, one of those modes is clearly more fun to everybody than the others. But my personal decision against a game can also be based on my personal pet peeves, like failure forcing you to replay large parts of Etherfields, while other people maybe have no problem with that as a game feature.
I don't think that objective reviews even exist. Our circumstances define us, and make us more susceptible to some issues than to others. For example, due to my circumstances, I am not highly sensitive to the price of a game, while for somebody in different circumstances that might be a major issue. And because novelty can be an important factor in the enjoyment of a game, and everybody's gaming history is different, the same game can feel very different to people who have played something similar before and those who didn't.
I am trying to express as well as I can what I liked and didn't like about a game in my more review-like posts. But I am aware that the aspects I am talking about might not even be relevant to you. I wouldn't want you to follow my recommendations if the arguments I used didn't resonate with you.
Comments:
<< Home
Newer› ‹Older
For PC games I always check the reviews on Steam, and read both positive and negative ones. You can usually tell after a few negative ones whether they are negative about things you care about, or things you don't.
One of the reasons I like reviews from Youtubers more then reviews from outlets like IGN or Gamespot is that I can watch someone like Skillup and get a sense for his personal tastes and can more or less determine if his tastes in games lines up with mine. In this way I can watch a review of his and even if we dont agree I can find his review useful.
With large game websites they have so many different people reviewing games that their reviews are kind of useless to me since so much of gaming is subjective.
With large game websites they have so many different people reviewing games that their reviews are kind of useless to me since so much of gaming is subjective.
Always ignore the official reviews and watch trusted independent Youtubers. Also, check for comments, previews and reviews on Reddit. Cyberpunk 2077? I can tell you it's maybe the worst piece of software we've seen in the past 10+ years. It's atrocious, I kid you not.
It's fine Tobold, I review stuff all the time (but no one reads it so it doesn't matter haha) - the more info on a game the better informed a decision people can make about getting it. I hadn't even heard of Etherfields before this post. :P
Board game wise I tend to try find Dice Tower reviews (especially those by Tom Vasel) as good places to start but then always looks for more reviews by others just to double check. Hmm... might see if he has an Etherfields one and see if it lines up with what you're saying. ^_^
Board game wise I tend to try find Dice Tower reviews (especially those by Tom Vasel) as good places to start but then always looks for more reviews by others just to double check. Hmm... might see if he has an Etherfields one and see if it lines up with what you're saying. ^_^
@Joseph Skyrim: Watch the Dice Tower review of Etherfields, then watch the Shut Up & Sit Down review of Etherfields. The difference is enlightening.
Post a Comment
<< Home