Tobold's Blog
Friday, September 27, 2024
 
Ara: History Untold

I have played Ara: History Untold for 26 hours. It is one of those games where I am happy enough playing it for a bit via Gamepass at $12/month, but would have regretted buying the game on Steam for $60. And it makes me happy that I bought the premium edition of Millennia for $60, because that game has a very different design philosophy and ends up being much better for it. The visual difference is enormous, Ara is the much prettier game, where Millennia is at best functional. But Ara wastes that huge graphics budget on game elements which are beautiful, but not practical at all. For example, Millennia has really bad looking combat, but at least you see which one of your units did a lot of damage to which enemy unit. Ara has pretty battle scenes that don't tell you anything at all. While the start of Ara is fun enough, and fulfills the "one more turn" criterion that 4X games need to have, it scales very badly and breaks down long before you reach the end of the game.

For example in my current game, I am on turn 275, in the last era of the second Act. I have 10 cities, which have 130 regions, and each region has between 2 and 5 zones. The game tells me that I have 85 crafting buildings, but doesn't offer similar information about harvesting buildings and support building. But I'd guess I have around 200 total buildings to manage. Every turn I craft 70 to 80 items, which I know because the game insists on giving me a stack of 70 to 80 popups every turn, and there is no way to close them all at once. Crafting buildings are privileged in that there are tools to show, for example, all your weavers. Harvesting buildings don't have a UI like that, and if you are looking for all your iron mines, you need to cycle through the list of harvesting buildings of all your cities, manually. That is probably because harvesting buildings can only produce up to 3 different things, while some crafting buildings can produce a dozen different things. While there is an UI to display crafting buildings, there is no way to either automate them, or to issue bulk commands to all of them. If you want all your weavers to switch from making fabric to making rope, you need to do that manually. And for each individual building you need to not only set the produced item, but also the resources used. If you don't have specific resources, you can sometimes replace them with money, or you will craft much slower. It is an extremely detailed system, which is fun enough as long as you have a very limited number of buildings, but then gets rather tedious by mid-game.

Cities have 5 main stats: Happiness, health, knowledge, prosperity, and security. Some buildings add to these stats. But mostly the stats are falling whenever the city is growing. So much of the stuff that you are producing in all these crafting buildings are amenities, consumables that give a stat boost for 5 to 10 turns. It is complicated, but manageable in Act I. But by getting more cities, and having each of these cities growing to more regions, balancing your cities' needs with the production of amenities becomes really tedious. And the imperfections of the UI makes every action take more clicks than it should do.

And that is Ara in a nutshell, a game mostly about crafting consumables. This is the part the devs really cared about. In some instances you can get an excruciating amount of details on crafting, like for example how much production you are losing due to rounding errors. The other parts of the 4X game mechanics are much less informative. Combat still gets some interesting numbers shown, but the battle animations are useless. Diplomacy is nearly completely a black box. One AI opponent offered me an alliance, and when I accepted he denounced me a turn later and started a war against me. With zero information what would have caused this radical change of mind. You never get messages that you are settling too close, or that you should keep your troops away from his territory. You just get a meter that ranges from adversary to ally, and that can fluctuate wildly without giving you any reason.

I will stop my current game, because there is no victory condition I could fulfil early. The winner is the player with the most prestige, and I already have twice as much prestige as the next player. Setting the difficulty right is somewhat difficult in Ara: At the end of each act, the lowest third of the players in prestige is getting kicked out of the game. Unless you specifically disable human players getting kicked out, you need to set the difficulty level low enough to be at least in the middle third of the prestige ranking at the end of the first act. But if you do that, you probably top the charts by the end of act 2. The AI difficulty, like in all 4X games, is set by how much the AI players are cheating, and that tends to be much more impactful in the early game.

Overall Ara feels as if the devs got a huge budget from Microsoft and made a very beautiful game, which doesn't work all that well in the long run. Unless you absolutely love micromanagement and crafting, I don't think I can recommend Ara for $60. I can, however, recommend paying $12 for the Gamepass for one month and trying Ara out that way. You'll probably still have time to try out a bunch of other games that month.

Comments:
Indeed, this was a possible buy for me but I checked with the 4Xgaming subreddit and it seems pretty disappointing, and also Steam reviews are mixed. It is said that they are hurrying to improve the very awkward UI, which by all accounts is certainly the worst thing about it. But improving the AI will be a harder task, and if they can't do that it may end up as the Civ version of a citybuilder at best.
 
I wonder if most of these devs of 4x games put the majority of their effort in the start or campaigns because they know most folks tend to restart after x amount of turns? A common thread with almost every 4x game I've played is that the end game is typically much more boring then the beginning, or the game just breaks down in the end game like you describe with Ara. Total War is my most played series in this genre and they pretty much all suffer from this problem. Even with Civ I often start to get bored in the later stages of the game.
 
I think the boring endgames are just an inevitable result of the way the genre works. More cities, more production, more units, more options. It just gets bogged down.

Some of the main games try to let you 'build tall' with a single city etc. And there are indie games that change the rules to simplify the genre or make it faster. But those don't have the specific 'feel' that has been hooking people since the original Civilisation.
 
I played a bit more, but after a total of 40 hours, I think I am finished with Ara. I increased difficulty to "Duke", and thought I was in trouble when Byzantium declared a war on annihilation on me. They turned out to be rather weak and in another war at the same time, so I managed to crush them and win the war. Winning the war catapulted me from last place to first place in the prestige ranking. The lack of diplomatic options and transparency of the diplomatic system is a real problem.
 
Post a Comment

<< Home
Newer›  ‹Older

  Powered by Blogger   Free Page Rank Tool