Monday, September 23, 2024
Beliefs and insurance
In The Color of Magic, Terry Pratchett writes "The gods had a habit of going round to atheists' houses and smashing their windows". Not believing in something is only an option if there is no consequence. And while in the real world there are still no gods smashing windows, another article of faith is increasingly being promoted by the strangest of all priesthoods: Insurance companies.
In 1508, Juan Ponce de León reported on the hurricane San Roque. Other reports of extreme weather events go back way further, and are even in the bible. The term "act of god" describing natural disasters is actually a legal term now, and not affiliated with any specific religion. People with different beliefs thus attribute extreme weather events like hurricanes to different sources: Some believe they are caused by human-made climate change, others believe that they have always been there, or are an expression of some divine will.
Even the best meteorologist can't possibly draw a direct causal link between any given hurricane and global warming. What climate science says is that global warming increases the probability of extreme weather events. Humans in general really suck at estimating probabilities. A change in probability of a hurricane arriving isn't tangible; even when the hurricane actually arrives, you still don't know whether global warming was involved in that, or whether it would have occurred even without climate change.
But if you have doubt about whether climate change is real, you could dispel that doubt with a simple, practical exercise: Inform yourself about the cost of homeowner insurance in Florida. It turns out that *some* humans are better at estimating probabilities than others; they are called actuaries and are mathematicians working for insurance companies. If you want to insure your house in a region that can be struck by hurricanes, an actuary will calculate the probability of this happening again, and the insurance premium will be calculated based on that. Yes, there are market inefficiencies, and yes price gouging by insurance companies can happen. But in the end a very large rise in the cost of homeowner insurance over time reflects a change of reality, a change in the probability of extreme weather events occurring.
The unbelievers are still fighting back. As part of the Agenda 2025, American conservatives propose to defund the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for the crime of giving out severe weather warnings in record numbers this year. But while you could silence a federal agency, no government would be able to change the actuaries' numbers and make insurance companies deny climate change. The gods of climate change are here, smashing in our windows. Time to start believing!
Comments:
<< Home
Newer› ‹Older
While I believe In general, the particulars are harder to believe. Sydney Australia has been reasonably cool for the last 4 years. We even broke some cold records last winter, in that time we have had 1 officially hot day as compared to 3 5 years ago. according to the climate believers the east coast of the north island in nz has rising ocean levels to the tune of 3-4 inches. Yet the same rocks in front of my grandmothers old home are an inch or two uncovered at low tide, just as they where 50 years ago.
Insurance rates are rising, in particular for the homes built on flood plains back in the 70's and 80's. So it turns out the once in a 100 year scenario for many of them turns out to be more like I in 10.
Insurance rates are rising, in particular for the homes built on flood plains back in the 70's and 80's. So it turns out the once in a 100 year scenario for many of them turns out to be more like I in 10.
Thanks for this great piece of content.
Interestingly, insurance cost are not only a depassionate and (shall I say it) scientific metric of a field's evolution: they also have a direct impact in agents' choices and market dynamics.
At a recent AI prospective conference, one of the speakers told us that the generalization of autonomous vehicles or surgery robots will be driven by insurance companies rather than tech firms. The day it's more expensive for someone to insure him/herself for manual driving, or for an hospital to insure its human surgeons rather than robots, will catalyze mass adoption.
Interestingly, insurance cost are not only a depassionate and (shall I say it) scientific metric of a field's evolution: they also have a direct impact in agents' choices and market dynamics.
At a recent AI prospective conference, one of the speakers told us that the generalization of autonomous vehicles or surgery robots will be driven by insurance companies rather than tech firms. The day it's more expensive for someone to insure him/herself for manual driving, or for an hospital to insure its human surgeons rather than robots, will catalyze mass adoption.
I'm not 100% sold. The rise in prices can be attributed to multiple things that are not climate change. A few that come up just off the top of my head are inflation, the fact that more people are moving there, the cost and types of houses are more expensive now than they were even 50 years ago. That is not even getting into different types of infrastructure for things like the internet, satellite etc... I'm sure excess litigation gets sucked into as well.
One thing I am sure of though...giving up more freedoms paying more taxes to the government is not going to "fix" the climate.
Post a Comment
One thing I am sure of though...giving up more freedoms paying more taxes to the government is not going to "fix" the climate.
<< Home